On 01/16/11 16:52, Stefan Richter wrote: > On Jan 16 Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Or do you expect a high-quality implementation of a configuration >> script to allow the user to just say "I want ocfs2", and then figure >> out the dependencies and solve them for you? >> >> I'd say that the latter case is OBVIOUSLY the quality implementation, >> while the former one is just stupid. > > As Al noted, there also needs to be a convenient way to *disable* options. > > Hence, the Kconfig files should merely declare the dependencies. Then, > some user interfaces should deal with the this database of dependencies > and let different people achieve different goals as easily as possible. > > We already have different UIs. But perhaps we have too much UI down in > the Kconfig files. I.e., perhaps Kconfig shouldn't know the difference > between depends-on and select. Let the different UIs present the > dependency graph to the operator in different ways, suitable to different > tasks. I agree, I think that the UIs should list a kconfig symbol and its dependencies, then let the user enable them as needed. > /handwave off. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
