On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:12:16PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:27:01PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > We also use holders/slaves links in libblkid to evaluate dependencies > > between devices (since 2008). > > > > > Whatever changes are needed, please keep this functionality, it > > > can be useful. > > > > Definitely. > > Yeah, sure, it's not like I can afford to avoid fixing it at this > point anyway, but I still want to point out it's at the wrong layer > and shouldn't have been added like this, really. If you want blkid to > identify it, the proper thing to do would be querying blk device for > the claimer and then use claimer-specific method to query them. It's It seems that dependencies (holders/slaves) between devices is pretty generic thing. Why do you think that we need claimer-specific method? The /sys filesystem is better that ictls in many ways. > not like the current method would make sense for btrfs or whatnot. Could you be more verbose, please? Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html