On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 12:01 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: >> Hm, what are the concurrencies that you need protection from? > > Ha, I think I'm wrong about this, after looking more closely at this I'm > struggling to see why autofs4_lock is needed at all. Well you did send me a series of patches to remove it, but unfortunately that was just as you made some larger changes to autofs4 upstream and I wasn't able to keep them up to date. It would be much appreciated if you had time to take another look at all the locking and streamline it. Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
