On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @flags can have O_CLOEXEC only so bitwise AND is not necessary. > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/eventpoll.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c > index 8cf07242067d..2e21fb85b8b6 100644 > --- a/fs/eventpoll.c > +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c > @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(epoll_create1, int, flags) > * a file structure and a free file descriptor. > */ > error = anon_inode_getfd("[eventpoll]", &eventpoll_fops, ep, > - O_RDWR | (flags & O_CLOEXEC)); > + O_RDWR | flags); I'm strong against this. Whenever a new flag is allowed this will explode... > if (error < 0) > ep_free(ep); > > -- > 1.7.3.4.600.g982838b0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html