Re: [PATCH] fs: FS_POSIX_ACL does not depend on BLOCK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 02/01/2011 07:29, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:17:16PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> +config FS_POSIX_ACL
>> +# Posix ACL utility routines
>> +# (for now, ext2/ext3/ext4/jfs/jffs2/reiserfs/xfs/btrfs/gfs2/ocfs2/nfs4/9p)
>> +#
>> +# NOTE: you can implement Posix ACLs without these helpers.
>> +# 	Never use this symbol for ifdefs.
>> +#
>> +	def_bool n
>> +
> 
> I'd drop the list of filesystems, and move the comment above the symbol,
> e.g:
> 
> #
> # Posix ACL utility routines
> #
> # Note: Posix ACLs can be implemented without these helpers.  Never use
> # this symbol for ifdefs in core code.
> #
> config FS_POSIX_ACL
> 	def_bool n
> 

I agree, the list can be a maintaince overhead.

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux