On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Christian Stroetmann <stroetmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Like I've said dozens of times, this is not about full DB functionality. >> Why do you keep making false analogies? > > The analogy is not so wrong. The concepts atomicity and abort/rollback your > are talking about are also concepts of the field of database management > systems (DBMSs). And once you have established the Atomicity, which is the A > of the principle ACID of DBMSs, you have the basis for establishing the > rest, the CID. > > And you even went further into this DBMS direction by letting down the > requirement of non-durability. Of course the concepts are the same. That doesn't mean the analogy is valid. >> Still waiting on any hint for why that performance loss would happen. > > From my point of view, the loss of performance depends on what is > benchmarked in which way. Maybe, but still no indication of why. Olaf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
