On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 01:30:05AM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote:
> An FS could easily have the rest of the functions of a database
> management system (DBMS) as an FSDB, a hybrid if you wish. An
> example for such a hybrid is the ext2/3-sqlite FS...
What are you talking about? If you mean creating a sqlite database on
top of an existing file system, sure that works fine. That's the
right solution. But if you mean trying to access sqllite via a
file-system interface (i.e., via FUSE), I suspect the result will be a
disaster, precisely because the file system API isn't expressive
enough to handle database functionality, and so the result ends up
being a performance disaster. So the answer is "use a database, using
a database API, if you have database requirements".
> Furthermore, the performance of Oracle's solutions was and still is
> so low, because they have a file system as a database that is
> managed by a DBMS as a file that again is stored in an FS. Can you
> see now what does the loss of performance?
It was a disaster from a performance perspective even if the database
was run on top of a raw block device....
> And Oracle fears FSs like R4 that have database(-like)
> functionalities, so it took those technical features of R4 for the
> BTRFS, which they thought could stop its show.
> And also, Oracle has started some months ago again to promote its FS
> in a DB in an FS concept.
I've never heard of the R4 file system, and apparently Google hasn't
either. But if you think BTRFS is a database, you're fooling
yourself. There's a lot more to a database than just using a b-tree.
> So, there must be something that is highly interesting with the idea
> to use an FS as DBMS, not only for Oracle, but at least for the four
> largest software companies.
No, I think you're just utterly confused from a technical perspective.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
