Re: [PATCH] mm: add replace_page_cache_page() function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> No. memory cgroup expects all pages should be found on LRU. But, IIUC,
> pages on this radix-tree will not be on LRU. So, memory cgroup can't find
> it at destroying cgroup and can't reduce "usage" of resource to be 0.
> This makes rmdir() returns -EBUSY.

Oh, right.  Yes, the page will be on the LRU (it needs to be,
otherwise the VM coulnd't reclaim it).  After the
add_to_page_cache_locked is this:

	if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
		lru_cache_add_file(newpage);

It will add the page to the LRU, unless it's already on it.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux