On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 19:49 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > Reviewing is lots easier if the patches present logical steps. The > > presented series will have us looking back and forth, review patch, find > > bugs, then scan fwd to see if the bug has been solved, etc.. > > Good suggestion. Sorry I did have the plan to fold them at some later > time. I'll do a new version to fold the patches 16-25. 26-31 will be > retained since they are logical enhancements that do not involve > back-and-forth changes. 12 will be removed as it seems not absolutely > necessary -- let the users do whatever they feel OK, even if it means > make the throttling algorithms work in some suboptimal condition. > Thanks, much appreciated! I'll await this new series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
