Re: [PATCH] vfs: Add a trace point in the mark_inode_dirty function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Yes, this came up before. Currently, if you add the if statement in the
> trcacepoint, you just wasted space. But if we can add a discard_entry,
> or better yet, I can add a TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION() that adds an if
> statement to check. Something like:
> 
> 	TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(name,
> 		[...]
> 	TP_condition(
> 			if (flags & (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC |
> 			    I_DIRTY_PAGES))
> 				return 1;
> 			else
> 				return 0;
> 		    ),

I love this idea. :)

For MM, struct page has a lot of union hack. then, page tracer strongly need conditional
trace point.


> 
> Have this run on the parameters and not the entry fields (because the
> entry fields are from the ring buffer, and to use them, we must first
> write to the ring buffer (something we want to avoid).
> 
> We could also make this code work with "pre-filters". That is, filters
> on the tracepoints that access the parameters and not the final entries.
> This would let us circumvent allocating ring buffer space when the
> filter states to skip the entry.
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 			
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux