On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:26:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:53:56 +1100 > Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:10:28PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Well, for now, the easiest and simplest fix is my patch, I think. The > > objection is that we may not write out anything for the specified sb, > > but the current implementation provides no such guarantees at all > > anyway, so I don't think it's a big issue. > > Well yes. We take something which will fail occasionally and with your > patch replace it with something which will fail a bit more often. Why > don't we go all the way and do something which will fail *even more > often*. Namely, just delete the damn function in the hope that the > resulting failures will provoke the ext4 crew into doing something sane > this time? I just need it fixed because the deadlocks are constantly hanging my tests and/or switching off lockdep. > Guys, this delalloc thing *sucks*. And here we are just sticking new > bandaids on top of the old bandaids. And the btrfs approach isn't > exactly a thing of glory, either. > > So... nope. I won't be applying Nick's patch. Please fix this thing > properly - you have a whole month! Testers have less. It would be better to fix it now and rip it out at the start of the next merge window if you're that way inclined :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
