Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs: peel back the inode_lock some more

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shouldn't inode_lock be completely gone after these?

also I hope moving to global locks really is just a step inbetween.
Especially for writeback I doubt moving from inode_lock to another
global lock makes a whole lot of difference - nevermind that it's
not too smart to lock per-object lists with a global lock.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux