On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:35:07AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:47:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote: > > What we need in the first step is to get VFS changes reviewed.Once we > > agree on the VFS changes done, then we can start looking at the changes > > upto NFS richacl nfs support. When get that merged then we can start > > having discussion on how local file system maintainers want to migrate > > the existing file system with posixacl to richacl. > > OK. So, personally: I'm resigned to the idea that we want support for > this ACL model. The vfs changes look OK to me (and wouldn't be changed > by any comments I'd have on the more richacl-specific patches to > follow). So that's an ACK from me on the first set of these patches, > assuming it's OK with people to merge these things one step at a time. Is there any progress on this? --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
