* Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Executive summary of the day's work: > Yesterday morning: 944 bytes per inode in core > Yesterday night: 24 bytes per inode in core > Tonight: 4 bytes per inode in core. > > That's a x236 time reduction in memory usage. No I didn't even start looking at a > freezer. Which could bring that 4 down to 0, but would add a scalability penalty > on all inodes when IMA was enabled. Why not use inode->i_security intelligently? That already exists so that way it's 0 bytes. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
