On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 06:28:05PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> I'd rather not say what I think about IMA sanity (and usefulness); as for what
> it tries to do... They want to whine if you open a file that is already opened
> for write and they want to whine if you open a file for write when it's already
> opened for read. Unless they decide to leave the file alone, that is.
Hm. Sounds like the same question that the file leases code needs
answered. The important difference is that the leases code can just
refuse to set a lease on inodes with multiple dentries.
While my mind's on it ... Al, is this code even close to correct?
if ((arg == F_RDLCK) && (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0))
goto out;
if ((arg == F_WRLCK)
&& ((atomic_read(&dentry->d_count) > 1)
|| (atomic_read(&inode->i_count) > 1)))
goto out;
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
