On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:06:50AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:18:35PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> > > > > Currently the inode hash lists are protected by the inode_lock. To > > allow removal of the inode_lock, we need to protect the inode hash > > table lists with a new lock. Nest the new inode_hash_lock inside the > > inode_lock to protect the hash lists. > > There is no reason to make inode_hash_lock global, it's only used inside > inode.c It was like that while hugetlbfs still used it. Fixed, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
