On 10/08/2010 05:06 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
On Thursday 07 October 2010 19:49:28 Eric Paris wrote:
The safest thing would probably be to punt the syscalls to 2.6.37.
Which is sad since I know a number of people are already working against
them, but maybe that proves it's the best approach?
I agree with removing the syscalls from 2.6.36 because of the following
reasons:
How would the mechanics of this be achieved?
Is it enough to just unconditionally return -ENOSYS from the sys_*()
functions? Or should all the patches be reverted?
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
