On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:21:24PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Before replacing the inode hash locking with a more scalable > mechanism, factor the removal of the inode from the hashes rather > than open coding it in several places. > > Based on a patch originally from Nick Piggin. Looks good as an equal transformation, but what code is doing with remove_inode_hash looks really buggy. It's doing a re-hash of a live inode which is probably causing enough problems by itself, but should at least have locks for it. Anyway, that's something for the coda folks to sort out. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
