Re: Is it legal to return positive value when do_execve() succeeds?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > fs/binfmt_elf.c:
> >  77 #define BAD_ADDR(x) ((unsigned long)(x) >= TASK_SIZE)
> Can do_brk() return BAD_ADDR() _and_ !IS_ERR_VALUE() value? when?

For example, arch/mips/include/asm/processor.h has below definitions
which is smaller than INT_MAX

 47 #ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
(...snipped...)
 52 #define TASK_SIZE       0x7fff8000UL
(...snipped...)
 63 #endif
 64 
 65 #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
(...snipped...)
 74 #define TASK_SIZE       0x10000000000UL
(...snipped...)
 91 #endif

Also, several architectures define TASK_SIZE as

  #define TASK_SIZE               PAGE_OFFSET

and PAGE_OFFSET could be 0 if CONFIG_KERNEL_RAM_BASE_ADDRESS is not defined.

include/asm-generic/page.h
 68 #ifdef CONFIG_KERNEL_RAM_BASE_ADDRESS
 69 #define PAGE_OFFSET             (CONFIG_KERNEL_RAM_BASE_ADDRESS)
 70 #else
 71 #define PAGE_OFFSET             (0)
 72 #endif

If TASK_SIZE == 0, BAD_ADDR(x) is always true and !IS_ERR_VALUE(x) can be true.
Although I don't know which combination makes such environment,
I think "BAD_ADDR() _and_ !IS_ERR_VALUE()" can happen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux