On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:02:51PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > I think the best resolution of this problem would be to change the work > that is submitted via bdi_start_writeback() (i.e., the work without > superblock = work which needs to do locking) to "target based scheme" like > Christoph wanted already some time ago. I actually have a patch to do this > for background writeback so I will just modify it to apply to a wider range > of writeback as well. Or Christoph, do you already have some patches in > this direction? I've not started any work on it yet. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
