(Resend with correct email for Ram Pai) On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:51:30AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Valerie Aurora wrote: > > copy_tree() can theoretically fail in a case other than ENOMEM, but > > always returns NULL which is interpreted by callers as -ENOMEM. > > Convert to return an explicit error. Convert clone_mnt() for > > consistency and because union mounts will add new error cases. > > I think it makes sense to push this fix to 2.6.37 independently of the > other patches. > > Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx> I'm certainly not going to argue, but I spent an hour trying to trigger the non-ENOMEM case (below) and failed - maybe it's unreachable? > > @@ -1212,11 +1216,12 @@ struct vfsmount *copy_tree(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry, > > struct path path; > > > > if (!(flag & CL_COPY_ALL) && IS_MNT_UNBINDABLE(mnt)) > > - return NULL; > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); Ram, do you remember how this worked? -VAL -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
