Re: [2.6.36-rc5] INET?: possible irq lock inversion dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 Ã 11:36 +0200, Eric Dumazet a Ãcrit :
> Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 Ã 18:10 +0900, Tetsuo Handa a Ãcrit :
> > Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > I would say someone calls xs_tcp_state_change() while softirqs are not
> > > masked.
> > > 
> > > If its expected, then following patch is needed ?
> > 
> > After applying your patch, I got the same warning on different place.
> > I got this when doing "mount 127.0.0.1:/usr/src/ /mnt/".
> 
> Hmm, but what are the changes in your tree ?
> 

(Because I dont have these lockdep splats here with 2.6.36-rc5)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux