On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:57 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> >> > Current oom_score_adj is completely broken because It is strongly bound >> > google usecase and ignore other all. >> > >> >> We've talked about this issue three times already. The last two times >> you've sent a revert patch, you failed to followup on the threads: >> >> http://marc.info/?t=128272938200002 >> http://marc.info/?t=128324705200002 >> >> And now you've gone above Andrew, who is the maintainer of this code, and >> straight to Linus. Between that and your failure to respond to my answers >> to your questions, I'm really stunned at how unprofessional you've handled >> this. > > Selfish must die. you failed to persuade to me. and I havgen't get anyone's objection. > Then, I don't care your ugly whining. I haven't followed the discussion at all so I hope you don't mind me jumping in. Are there some real-world bug reports where OOM rewrite is to blame? Why haven't those been fixed? Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
