On Tuesday 14 September 2010 22:53:31 Linus Torvalds wrote: > Oh well. I guess there's no incremental way to do things sanely. And > nobody has patches to fix those users, I guess. The only critical user is fs/lockd, I can easily handle the rest. When I talked to Bruce and Trond during LinuxCon, they told me that it should be possible to separate the bits of fs/lockd that lock against fs/locks.c and convert the former to use lock_flocks(). That would be enough to actually apply this patch without the nasty CONFIG_BKL check and with changes to the few other consumers of file locks. My original plan was to have my current patch in -next until that happens. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html