Re: [PATCH 5/5] writeback: Reporting dirty thresholds in /proc/vmstat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:58:13 -0700
Michael Rubin <mrubin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The kernel already exposes the user desired thresholds in /proc/sys/vm
> with dirty_background_ratio and background_ratio. But the kernel may
> alter the number requested without giving the user any indication that
> is the case.
> 
> Knowing the actual ratios the kernel is honoring can help app developers
> understand how their buffered IO will be sent to the disk.
> 
>         $ grep threshold /proc/vmstat
>         nr_dirty_threshold 409111
>         nr_dirty_background_threshold 818223
> 

Yes, I think /proc/vmstat is a decent place to put these.  The needed
infrastructural support is minimal and although these numbers are
closely tied to the implementation-of-the-day, people should expect
individual fields in /proc/vmstat to appear and disappear at random as
kernel versions change.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux