On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Neil Brown wrote: > > You can implement ->read() on the symlink file instead. > > I would suggest that is a much uglier hack than changed readlinkat to accept > a NULL pathname. I think read(2) is a natural interface for reading symlinks and would have been a perfectly fine API to choose instead of a specialized syscall. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
