Re: [2.6.36-rc3] Workqueues, XFS, dependencies and deadlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On 09/08/2010 12:12 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Ok, so in this case if this was on CPU 1, I'd see kworker[1:0],
> kworker[1:1] and kworker[1:2] threads all accumulate CPU time?  I'm
> just trying to relate your example it to behaviour I've seen to
> check if I understand the example correctly.

Yes, you're right.  If all three works just burn CPU cycles for 5ms
then you'll only see one kworker w/ 15ms of accumulated CPU time.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux