On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of > trylock_page() in this case. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 5979850..79bd812 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -665,7 +665,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, > page = lru_to_page(page_list); > list_del(&page->lru); > > - if (!trylock_page(page)) > + if (sync_writeback == PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC) > + lock_page(page); > + else if (!trylock_page(page)) > goto keep; > > VM_BUG_ON(PageActive(page)); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
