Hi Tejun, On 09/03/2010 02:43 AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > rq->rq_disk and bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk may differ if a request has > passed through remapping drivers. FSEQ_DATA request incorrectly > followed bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk ending up being issued w/ mismatching > rq_disk. Make it follow orig_rq->rq_disk. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Kiyoshi, can you please apply this patch on top and verify that the > problem goes away? The reason I and Mike didn't see the problem was > because we were using REQ_FUA capable underlying device, which makes > block layer bypass sequencing for FSEQ_DATA request. > > Thanks. > > block/blk-flush.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > Index: block/block/blk-flush.c > =================================================================== > --- block.orig/block/blk-flush.c > +++ block/block/blk-flush.c > @@ -111,6 +111,13 @@ static struct request *queue_next_fseq(s > break; > case QUEUE_FSEQ_DATA: > init_request_from_bio(rq, orig_rq->bio); > + /* > + * orig_rq->rq_disk may be different from > + * bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk if orig_rq got here through > + * remapping drivers. Make sure rq->rq_disk points > + * to the same one as orig_rq. > + */ > + rq->rq_disk = orig_rq->rq_disk; > rq->cmd_flags &= ~(REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA); > rq->cmd_flags |= orig_rq->cmd_flags & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA); > rq->end_io = flush_data_end_io; Ah, I see, thank you for the quick fix! I confirmed no panic occurs with this patch. Tested-by: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> By the way, I had been considering a block-layer interface which remaps struct request and its bios to a block device such as: void blk_remap_request(struct request *rq, struct block_device *bdev) { rq->rq_disk = bdev->bd_disk; __rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) { bio->bi_bdev = bdev->bd_disk; } } If there is such an interface and remapping drivers use it, then these kind of issues may be avoided in the future. Thanks, Kiyoshi Ueda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html