Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 2010-09-02 15:32, Neil Brown wrote:
>> 
>> Oh and I what I like to see is support for multiple readonly branches :)
>
>I think we very nearly have that, assuming I understand your requirement
>correctly.
>The lower filesystem can itself be an overlay, providing it is mounted
>read-only.
>
>So if /mnt/ro1 /mnt/ro2 /mnt/ro3 are all read-only branches then
>
> mount -o ro,lowerdir=/mnt/ro1,upperdir=/mnt/ro2 meaninglessstring /mnt/ov1
> mount -o ro,lowerdir=/mnt/ov1,upperdir=/mnt/ro3 meaninglessstring /mnt/ov2
> mount -o lowerdir=/mnt/ov2,upperdir=/mnt/rw ignoreme /mnt/overlay
>
>and /mnt/overlay will be the combination of 3 read-only filesystems and one
>writable one.
>(this doesn't work with the code as-is, but it is really just a few bug-fixes
>away).

There ought to be a reason that other implementations offer
doing multiple branches with a single vfsmount.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux