Re: [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Kara, on 08/31/2010 12:20 AM wrote:
On Mon 30-08-10 15:56:43, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Jan Kara<jack@xxxxxxx>  writes:

   An update: I've set up an ext4 barrier testing in KVM - run fsstress,
kill KVM at some random moment and check that the filesystem is consistent
(kvm is run in cache=writeback mode to simulate disk cache). About 70 runs

But doesn't your "disk cache" survive the "power cycle" of your guest?
   Yes, you're right. Thinking about it now the test setup was wrong because
it didn't refuse writes to the VM's data partition after the moment I
killed KVM. Thanks for catching this. I will probably have to use the fault
injection on the host to disallow writing the device at a certain moment.
Or does somebody have a better option?

Have you considered to setup a second box as an iSCSI target (e.g. with iSCSI-SCST)? With it killing the connectivity is just a matter of a single iptables command + a lot more options.

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux