Re: [PATCH 4/4] writeback: Reporting dirty thresholds in /proc/vmstat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:28 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> afaict, you and wu agreed /debug/bdi/default/stats is enough good.
> why do you change your mention?

I commented on this in the 0/4 email of the bug. I think these belong
in /proc/vmstat but I saw they exist in /debug/bdi/default/stats. I
figure they will probably not be accepted but I thought it was worth
attaching for consideration of upgrading from debugfs to /proc.

mrubin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux