On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Shawn Bohrer wrote: > This make epoll use hrtimers for the timeout value which prevents > epoll_wait() from timing out up to a millisecond early. > > This mirrors the behavior of select() and poll(). I saw this now, since I got notifications from Andrew's patch machine. Is this really needed? Is that really worth the extra code in the fast path? Aren't we breaking existing behavior? I have some doubts. - Davide -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
