[add CC to afs/cifs/ceph maintainers]
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:55:53AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:37:10AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:15:25AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > I'm looking at backporting some upstream changes to earlier kernels,
> > > and ran across something I don't quite understand...
> > >
> > > In nfs_commit_unstable_pages, we set the flags to FLUSH_SYNC. We then
> > > zero out the flags if wbc->nonblocking or wbc->for_background is set.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't we also clear it out if wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE ?
> > > WB_SYNC_NONE means "don't wait on anything", so shouldn't that include
> > > not waiting on the COMMIT to complete?
> >
> > I've been trying to figure out what the nonblocking flag is supposed
> > to mean for a while now.
> >
> > It basically disappeared in commit 0d99519efef15fd0cf84a849492c7b1deee1e4b7
> >
> > "writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks"
> >
> > from Wu. What's left these days is a couple of places in local copies
> > of write_cache_pages (afs, cifs), and a couple of checks in random
> > writepages instances (afs, block_write_full_page, ceph, nfs, reiserfs, xfs)
> > and the use in nfs_write_inode.
>
> In principle all nonblocking checks in ->writepages should be removed.
>
> (My original patch does have chunks for afs/cifs that somehow get
> dropped in the process, and missed ceph because it's not upstream
> when I started patch..)
>
> > It's only actually set for memory
> > migration and pageout, that is VM writeback.
> >
> > To me it really doesn't make much sense, but maybe someone has a better
> > idea what it is for.
>
> Since migration and pageout still set nonblocking for ->writepage, we
> may keep them in the near future, until VM does not start IO on itself.
>
> > > + if (wbc->nonblocking || wbc->for_background ||
> > > + wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> >
> > You could remove the nonblocking and for_background checks as
> > these impliy WB_SYNC_NONE.
>
> Agreed.
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
Subject: writeback: remove useless nonblocking checks in ->writepages
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Aug 20 07:04:54 CST 2010
This removes more deadcode that was somehow missed by commit 0d99519efef
(writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks).
The nonblocking checks in ->writepages are no longer used because the
flusher now prefer to block on get_request_wait() than to skip inodes on
IO congestion. The latter will lead to more seeky IO.
CC: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/afs/write.c | 16 +---------------
fs/cifs/file.c | 10 ----------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 25 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/fs/afs/write.c 2010-06-24 14:32:01.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/afs/write.c 2010-08-20 07:03:01.000000000 +0800
@@ -455,8 +455,6 @@ int afs_writepage(struct page *page, str
}
wbc->nr_to_write -= ret;
- if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi))
- wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
_leave(" = 0");
return 0;
@@ -529,11 +527,6 @@ static int afs_writepages_region(struct
wbc->nr_to_write -= ret;
- if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
- wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
- break;
- }
-
cond_resched();
} while (index < end && wbc->nr_to_write > 0);
@@ -554,18 +547,11 @@ int afs_writepages(struct address_space
_enter("");
- if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
- wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
- _leave(" = 0 [congest]");
- return 0;
- }
-
if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
start = mapping->writeback_index;
end = -1;
ret = afs_writepages_region(mapping, wbc, start, end, &next);
- if (start > 0 && wbc->nr_to_write > 0 && ret == 0 &&
- !(wbc->nonblocking && wbc->encountered_congestion))
+ if (start > 0 && wbc->nr_to_write > 0 && ret == 0)
ret = afs_writepages_region(mapping, wbc, 0, start,
&next);
mapping->writeback_index = next;
--- linux-next.orig/fs/cifs/file.c 2010-08-20 06:57:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/cifs/file.c 2010-08-20 07:03:01.000000000 +0800
@@ -1379,16 +1379,6 @@ static int cifs_writepages(struct addres
return generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
- /*
- * BB: Is this meaningful for a non-block-device file system?
- * If it is, we should test it again after we do I/O
- */
- if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
- wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
- kfree(iov);
- return 0;
- }
-
xid = GetXid();
pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
