Re: [PATCH 00/15] replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:11:27AM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:29:08AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This series converts over all filesystems to the new WRITE_FLUSH_FUA
> > primitive that Tejun added.  XFS, btrfs, gfs2, reiserfs, ext3 and ext4
> > have passed extensive xfstests coverage with this, while ocfs2, nilfs2
> > and fat are unsupposed by xfstests and thus untested in this patch.
> 
> Tejun's patches didn't make the merge window, right?

No.

> I wonder if it makes sense to make a special appeal to Linus to get
> the new kernel interface(s) for WRITE_FLUSH_FUA into 2.6.36-rc2 (without
> any callers) to make it easier for us to do testing and merging into
> our respective file system trees?

I don't think that's feasible.  The code added is not new but
modifies/replaces the existing barrier state machine.  What we'll have
to instead is to have a tree with all these changes for testing.
I've already got the promise from the RH filesystem QA team to get some
powerfail testing resources allocated to this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux