[PATCH v2] cramfs: only unlock new inodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Commit 77b8a75f5bb introduced a warning at fs/inode.c:692 unlock_new_inode(),
caused by unlock_new_inode() being called on existing inodes as well. This
is a regression in 2.6.36-rc1.

This patch changes get_cramfs_inode() to only call unlock_new_inode() for
I_NEW inodes.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 fs/cramfs/inode.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cramfs/inode.c b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
index a53b130..1e7a330 100644
--- a/fs/cramfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static struct inode *get_cramfs_inode(struct super_block *sb,
 		}
 	} else {
 		inode = iget_locked(sb, CRAMINO(cramfs_inode));
-		if (inode) {
+		if (inode && (inode->i_state & I_NEW)) {
 			setup_inode(inode, cramfs_inode);
 			unlock_new_inode(inode);
 		}
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux