Re: UnionMount status?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17 August 2010 21:51, Valerie Aurora <vaurora@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 04:31:48PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 17 August 2010 14:03, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 16 August 2010 20:52, Valerie Aurora <vaurora@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for attaching your .config. ??CONFIG_UNION_MOUNT wasn't set:
>> >>
>> >> # CONFIG_UNION_MOUNT is not set
>> >>
>> >> Try rebuilding with that on. ??Yes, it should build without
>> >> CONFIG_UNION_MOUNT and I'll test that for next release.
>> >>
>> >> -VAL
>> >>
>> >
>> > Sorry, I thought I enabled it.
>> >
>> > Anyway, I changed that option in the config but it still does not build.
>> >
>>
>> OK, a build without the ext2 filesystem works.
>>
>> Now when I try to mount the filesystem I get:
>>
>>                      (initramfs) mount_full -t tmpfs -o union tmpfs /root
>>                       [   43.403419] tmpfs: No value for mount option
>> 'union'
>>                       mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock
>> on tmpfs,
>>                              missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>>                              (for several filesystems (e.g. nfs, cifs) you might
>>                              need a /sbin/mount.<type> helper program)
>>                              In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>>                              dmesg | tail  or so
>>
>> I wonder if the docs are out of date. They suggest to only add -o union.
>>
>> I think it used to work, I recycled the scripts that produced the
>> halfway-booting system last time.
>
> Hm, does mount_full call the new mount binary built from the union
> mounts util-linux-ng git tree?  You can find the git tree here:
>
> http://valerieaurora.org/union/
>
Yes, that's the problem. I installed a wrong package and the mount
command did not get updated.

I copy it as moutn_full into initramfs because mount is normally
something from klibc or busybox.

A dmesg can be found here:  http://paste.debian.net/84100

The system often boots but some features fail at random probably
depending on the part of init which is affected by the unionmount
failures.

Thanks

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux