On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:03:41PM -0700, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
> As part of adding support for OCFS2 to mount huge volumes, we need to
> check that the sector_t and page cache of the system are capable of
> addressing the entire volume.
>
> An identical check already appears in ext3 and ext4. This patch moves
> the addressability check into its own function in fs/libfs.c and
> modifies ext3 and ext4 to invoke it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick LoPresti <lopresti@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear ext3/4 folks,
I've pushed this patch to the merge-window branch of ocfs2.git.
I'm ready to send it to Linus, But I need your OK.
Joel
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 471e1ff..6aff3f5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -2399,6 +2399,8 @@ extern ssize_t simple_write_to_buffer(void *to, size_t available, loff_t *ppos,
>
> extern int generic_file_fsync(struct file *, int);
>
> +extern int generic_check_addressable(unsigned, u64);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> extern int buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space *,
> struct page *, struct page *);
> diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
> index dcaf972..b969648 100644
> --- a/fs/libfs.c
> +++ b/fs/libfs.c
> @@ -955,6 +955,38 @@ int generic_file_fsync(struct file *file, int datasync)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_file_fsync);
>
> +/**
> + * generic_check_addressable - Check addressability of file system
> + * @blocksize_bits: log of file system block size
> + * @num_blocks: number of blocks in file system
> + *
> + * Determine whether a file system with @num_blocks blocks (and a
> + * block size of 2**@blocksize_bits) is addressable by the sector_t
> + * and page cache of the system. Return 0 if so and -EFBIG otherwise.
> + */
> +int generic_check_addressable(unsigned blocksize_bits, u64 num_blocks)
> +{
> + u64 last_fs_block = num_blocks - 1;
> +
> + BUG_ON(blocksize_bits < 9);
> + BUG_ON(blocksize_bits > PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);
> +
> + if (unlikely(num_blocks == 0))
> + return 0;
> +
> + printk(KERN_INFO "HERE %u %lu %u %u", blocksize_bits, last_fs_block,
> + sizeof(sector_t), sizeof(pgoff_t));
Minus this printk(), of course ;-)
> +
> + if ((last_fs_block >
> + (sector_t)(~0ULL) >> (blocksize_bits - 9)) ||
> + (last_fs_block >
> + (pgoff_t)(~0ULL) >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - blocksize_bits))) {
> + return -EFBIG;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_check_addressable);
> +
> /*
> * No-op implementation of ->fsync for in-memory filesystems.
> */
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c
> index 6c953bb..d0643db 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/super.c
> @@ -1862,8 +1862,8 @@ static int ext3_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> goto failed_mount;
> }
>
> - if (le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count) >
> - (sector_t)(~0ULL) >> (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9)) {
> + if (generic_check_addressable(sb->s_blocksize_bits,
> + le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count))) {
> ext3_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
> "error: filesystem is too large to mount safely");
> if (sizeof(sector_t) < 8)
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 4e8983a..979cc57 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -2706,15 +2706,13 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> * Test whether we have more sectors than will fit in sector_t,
> * and whether the max offset is addressable by the page cache.
> */
> - if ((ext4_blocks_count(es) >
> - (sector_t)(~0ULL) >> (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9)) ||
> - (ext4_blocks_count(es) >
> - (pgoff_t)(~0ULL) >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - sb->s_blocksize_bits))) {
> + ret = generic_check_addressable(sb->s_blocksize_bits,
> + ext4_blocks_count(es));
> + if (ret) {
> ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "filesystem"
> " too large to mount safely on this system");
> if (sizeof(sector_t) < 8)
> ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "CONFIG_LBDAF not enabled");
> - ret = -EFBIG;
> goto failed_mount;
> }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
--
"What does it say about a society's priorities when the time you
spend in meetings on Monday is greater than the total number of
hours you spent sleeping over the weekend?"
- Nat Friedman
Joel Becker
Consulting Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
