On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 08:51 +0900, Keika Kobayashi wrote:
> (2010/07/31 4:06), Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making it's value be printed too
> > far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit
> > neater.
> >
> > Currently:
> > CPU0
> > HI: 0
> > TIMER: 599792
> > NET_TX: 2
> > NET_RX: 6
> > BLOCK: 80807
> > BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
> > TASKLET: 20012
> > SCHED: 0
> > HRTIMER: 63
> > RCU: 619279
> >
> > With patch:
> > CPU0
> > HI: 0
> > TIMER: 585582
> > NET_TX: 2
> > NET_RX: 6
> > BLOCK: 80320
> > BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
> > TASKLET: 19287
> > SCHED: 0
> > HRTIMER: 62
> > RCU: 604441
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Davidlohr
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/softirqs.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> > index 1807c24..3799473 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> > @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> > {
> > int i, j;
> >
> > - seq_printf(p, " ");
> > + seq_printf(p, " ");
> > for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> > seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i);
> > seq_printf(p, "\n");
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
> > - seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
> > + seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
> > for_each_possible_cpu(j)
> > seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
> > seq_printf(p, "\n");
>
> Sorry for late response.
>
> It looks good to me.
>
> // Keika Kobayashi
Then, if no one objects, can we get it added upstream?
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
