Re: [RFC] relaxed barrier semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig, on 08/05/2010 09:09 PM wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:11:56PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Chris Mason, on 08/02/2010 09:39 PM wrote:
I regret putting the ordering into the original barrier code...it
definitely did help reiserfs back in the day but it stinks of magic and
voodoo.

But if the ordering isn't in the common (block) code, how to implement
the "hardware offload" for ordering, i.e. ORDERED commands, in an
acceptable way?

Right now we have no working implementation of actually using ordered
tags for a storage device in Linux. There's very little need for common
code in that implementation - basically we just need flag in the bio /
request to make this one an ordered tag in addition to the existing
reordering preventing in the block queue.

New flag.. Easy to add, hard to live with. Aren't you already tied of the existing flags hell?

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux