On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For pages_dirtied and pages_entered_writeback: it's hard to see how any > reimplementation of writeback would have any problem implementing > these, so OK. > > But dirty_threshold_kbytes and dirty_background_threshold_kbytes are > closely tied to the implementation-of-the-day and so I don't think they > should be presented in /proc. OK I will resend patch without threshold and then look for the write place in debugfs to put them in a subsequent patch. Thanks, mrubin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
