On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:03:42PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 10:06 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > plain text document attachment (writeback-less-bdi-calc.patch) > > Split get_dirty_limits() into global_dirty_limits()+bdi_dirty_limit(), > > so that the latter can be avoided when under global dirty background > > threshold (which is the normal state for most systems). > > The patch looks OK, although esp with the proposed comments in the > follow up email, bdi_dirty_limit() gets a bit confusing wrt to how and > what the limit is. > > Maybe its clearer to not call task_dirty_limit() from bdi_dirty_limit(), > that way the comment can focus on the device write request completion > proportion thing. > > > +unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, > > + unsigned long dirty) > > +{ > > + u64 bdi_dirty; > > + long numerator, denominator; > > > > + /* > > + * Calculate this BDI's share of the dirty ratio. > > + */ > > + bdi_writeout_fraction(bdi, &numerator, &denominator); > > > > + bdi_dirty = (dirty * (100 - bdi_min_ratio)) / 100; > > + bdi_dirty *= numerator; > > + do_div(bdi_dirty, denominator); > > > > + bdi_dirty += (dirty * bdi->min_ratio) / 100; > > + if (bdi_dirty > (dirty * bdi->max_ratio) / 100) > > + bdi_dirty = dirty * bdi->max_ratio / 100; > > + > + return bdi_dirty; > > } > > And then add the call to task_dirty_limit() here: > > > +++ linux-next/mm/backing-dev.c 2010-07-11 08:53:44.000000000 +0800 > > @@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ static int bdi_debug_stats_show(struct s > > nr_more_io++; > > spin_unlock(&inode_lock); > > > > - get_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh, &bdi_thresh, bdi); > > + global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh); > > + bdi_thresh = bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, dirty_thresh); > + bdi_thresh = task_dirty_limit(current, bdi_thresh); > > And add a comment to task_dirty_limit() as well, explaining its reason > for existence (protecting light/slow dirtying tasks from heavier/fast > ones). Good suggestions, that would be much less confusing. Will post updated patches tomorrow. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html