Re: [PATCHv6 00/15] kill unnecessary bdi wakeups + cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-08-03 14:37, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 14:27 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2010-07-25 13:29, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> here is v6 of the patch series which clean-ups bdi threads and substantially
>>> lessens amount of unnecessary kernel wake-ups, which is very important on
>>> battery-powered devices.
>>>
>>> This patch-set is also available at:
>>> git://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/misc-2.6.git flushers_v6
>>
>> Thanks Artem, for sticking around long enough to get this into
>> shape. I have finally merged it.
> 
> Thanks, but
> 
>>> 1. Use 'spin_lock_bh' for the 'bdi->wb_lock' (changed patch N12)
>>
>> I'd rather not, question is how to avoid it. Either just wakeup the
>> default thread, or punt the lock-and-check bdi->wb.task to a thread.
> 
> you merged this change, do you want me to send a separate patch which
> undo the 'spin_lock_bh' change? I'll think about how to avoid this and
> come back.

Yes, it's not a huge thing, but it would be nice to get rid of. So I
figured it was better to merge it and not have you respin the series yet
again.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux