[PATCH] Fix /proc/softirqs file formatting

[Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making it's value be printed too
far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit
neater.

Currently:
                CPU0
      HI:          0
   TIMER:     599792
  NET_TX:          2
  NET_RX:          6
   BLOCK:      80807
BLOCK_IOPOLL:          0
 TASKLET:      20012
   SCHED:          0
 HRTIMER:         63
     RCU:     619279

With patch:
                    CPU0
          HI:          0
       TIMER:     585582
      NET_TX:          2
      NET_RX:          6
       BLOCK:      80320
BLOCK_IOPOLL:          0
     TASKLET:      19287
       SCHED:          0
     HRTIMER:         62
         RCU:     604441



Thanks,
Davidlohr
 

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/proc/softirqs.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
index 1807c24..3799473 100644
--- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
+++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
 {
 	int i, j;
 
-	seq_printf(p, "                ");
+	seq_printf(p, "                    ");
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
 		seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i);
 	seq_printf(p, "\n");
 
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
-		seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
+		seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
 		for_each_possible_cpu(j)
 			seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
 		seq_printf(p, "\n");
-- 
1.7.0.4



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html