Re: [PATCH 00/09] cifs: local caching support using FS-Cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In my opinion there should be article published about this, describing
fs-cache generally, and these kinds of benchmarks!

Using fs-cache for network filesystem is an important issue, and
should get "exposure".

Stef Bon

2010/7/23 Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 2010-07-22, at 11:40, David Howells wrote:
>> Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> As it can been seen, the performance while reading when data is cache
>>> hot (disk) is not great as the network link is a Gigabit ethernet (with
>>> server having working set in memory) which is mostly expected.
>>
>> That's what I see with NFS and AFS too.
>>
>>> (I could not get access to a slower network (say 100 Mb/s) where the real
>>> performance boost could be evident).
>
> More interesting than a slow network is testing with more clients.  10 clients should be able to get 10x the read performance from the client-local cache, probably more than the server's peak disk/network bandwidth.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux