On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 18:05 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > This is producing 2 unrequired context switches, so I really would > like to see it done properly. Setting up a timer is really pretty > simple (or if you would care to implement a delayed process wakeup > API, I think that would be useful -- I'm surprised there isn't one > already). OK, a generic 'wake_up_process_timeout()' would need a timer, and it cannot set it up on stack because it has to return immediately, this is why we do not have such a generic helper, I think. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html