On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 18:05 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > I can see what you mean, but I think the designs in core code should > be made as efficient as possible _unless_ there is some complication > in doing otherwise (not the other way around). > > This is producing 2 unrequired context switches, so I really would > like to see it done properly. Setting up a timer is really pretty > simple (or if you would care to implement a delayed process wakeup > API, I think that would be useful -- I'm surprised there isn't one > already). OK, NP, I'll work on this. The only problem I see is that it will involve more maintainers and trees (I guess Ingo?), and make it even more difficult for me to reach upstream :-) But let's try and see! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
