On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 15:14 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > here is v6 of my SB sync wakups killing patches, v5 may be found: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127583599911620&w=2 > > This is more of a reminder re-send, I did not get any feed-back for > v5. Not much changes since v5: > > 1. Drop patches which fix race conditions for s_dirty changes WRT actual > write-back - these things are independent and I am planning to go through > that separately. > 2. Add "Acked-by" to the btrfs patch. > 3. Fold all per-fs patches which introduce SB accessors into one big patch. Hi Al, you "unofficially" told me that you want to get rid of '->write_super()' and 'sync_supers()' should not exist. And FSes which really need '->write_super()' should implement that themselves. I will try to work on this, but a bit later, after my holidays. But could you please: 1. confirm that you want to kill '->write_super()' and '->s_dirt' "officially", so that I could refer to this when sending patches 2. pick up patches 1-6 from this series, this would make my life easier a bit. I'm not sure then what do do with: commit 140236b4b1c749c9b795ea3d11558a0eb5a3a080 Author: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Jun 10 13:56:33 2010 +0300 VFS: introduce s_dirty accessors which Linus merged, but which is now not needed, since you now want me to kill '->write_super()' completely. Will you take care of this please? Thanks! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
