Re: [PATCH 4/8] vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages in direct reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 03:31:19PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:28:44PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:38:57PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > @@ -858,7 +872,7 @@ keep:
> > > >  
> > > >  	free_page_list(&free_pages);
> > > >  
> > > > -	list_splice(&ret_pages, page_list);
> > > 
> > > This will lose all retry pages forever, I think.
> > > 
> > 
> > Above this is
> > 
> > while (!list_empty(page_list)) {
> > 	...
> > }
> > 
> > page_list should be empty and keep_locked is putting the pages on ret_pages
> > already so I think it's ok.
> 
> But ret_pages is function-local.  Putting them back on the then-empty
> page_list is to give them back to the caller, otherwise they are lost
> in a dead stack slot.
> 

Bah, you're right, it is repaired now. /me slaps self. Thanks

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux