On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 12:31 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > spin_unlock(&inode_lock); > + > + if (wakeup_bdi) { > + spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock); > + if (!bdi->wb.task) > + wake_up_process(default_backing_dev_info.wb.task); > + else > + wake_up_process(bdi->wb.task); > + spin_unlock(&bdi->wb_lock); > + } > } Dave, I do not know whether this stuff will end up in upstream, I did not get any feed back from Jens so far. But if it will, I'd like to let you know that the code quoted above is similar to the 'bdi_queue_work()' function. And the purpose is very similar. But you added a 'trace_writeback_nothread()' call to 'bdi_queue_work()', and I think a similar call has to be here. Can I call 'trace_writeback_nothread()'? I guess not. Should I create another trace point? Any hints/instructions? Note, the patches are against Jens' tree. Please, see linux-fsdevel or lkml for the full patch and its purposes. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html